It must be silly season in Sacramento. As the state receives billions in unanticipated revenues, liberal tax-and-spend lawmakers are proposing massive tax hikes, proving once again that they are out of touch with reality.
One key measure of reality ignored by liberal lawmakers is Tax Freedom Day. Calculated annually by the Tax Foundation, Tax Freedom Day is the day Americans have earned enough money to pay their annual tax obligations at the federal, state and local levels.
This year, National Tax Freedom Day arrived on April 24, but Californians didn’t achieve tax freedom until May 3. That means Californians had to work nine days longer than the national average to fulfill their tax obligations.
California’s Tax Freedom Day is the fourth latest in the nation. Only Connecticut, New Jersey and New York have later dates.
By proposing higher taxes, liberal legislators are trying to make taxpayers work even longer to pay their tax bill.
The other reality ignored by would-be tax hikers is that state government already has more than enough money. Due to the state’s volatile tax structure, a booming tech sector and soaring stock market, state officials are now swimming in cash.
In the critical month of April, state income tax revenues exceeded budget projections by $1.8 billion.
Just how much money is $1.8 billion? If state officials put the money in one dollar increments, they could string those bills together and have a chain long enough to travel the California coastline more than 200 times.
The same chain of dollars could wrap around the earth nearly seven times. It could even stretch more than seven tenths of the distance to the moon.
That is just counting unexpected revenue from April alone. Experts believe unbudgeted surplus revenues for the current fiscal year will exceed $4 billion by June 30, an amount larger than the entire budgets of four states.
With state coffers overflowing, it’s becoming increasingly bizarre that Sacramento spenders are proposing new taxes. Is their appetite for taxpayer dollars insatiable?
Among other schemes, they are plotting how to extend Prop. 30, the “temporary” sales and income tax increases voters approved in 2012. As I have observed many times, it is rare to see a temporary tax go away, regardless of promises made to voters.
Reinforcing how out of touch they really are, prominent Democratic legislators have proposed massive tax increases on driving, gasoline purchases and vehicle registrations (SB 16), insurance policies (AB 1203), real estate documents (AB 1335) and services that could include haircuts, movie tickets and many more (SB 8).
In addition, big spending lawmakers have introduced two constitutional amendments (ACA 4 and SCA 5) aimed at making it easier to approve regressive local tax hikes, including parcel taxes on homeowners. The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. warns that these measures are a direct attack on Prop. 13, which voters approved in 1978 to protect homeowners from losing their homes to rising tax bills.
It seems that –regardless of reality — in California another day means another proposed tax increase. Despite our state’s high tax ranking and surging revenues, spending-addicted lawmakers always want more of your dollars.
Instead of ensuring taxpayers receive value for the dollars they send to Sacramento, lawmakers are taking the easy road by simply proposing new taxes. This allows legislators to avoid tough decisions and keep saying yes to special interest groups.
Let us hope there are a few folks left in the state capitol who have the good sense to say no to their proposals.
Mr. Runner, Vice Chair of the State Board of Equalization, may be contacted at boe.ca.gov/Runner.
One Comment on ““Tax Hikes Look Silly as State Gets Financial Windfall””
Nothing will change in this State EXCEPT TAXES until we get rid of the tax, spend and waste people in elective office. I suggest that we work really hard to get a part time legislature to force politicians to get a worthwhile job other than fleecing all of the California residents. For those who may actually VOTE, don’t ever vote for more bonds or spending measures on the ballot. The ballot is the legislator’s dodge for ever having to vote publicly to fleece us.
Why do most of these officials always leave office filthy rich with lifetime pensions and insurance that we could never have?