Since Barack Obama’s greasy Organizing for Action group jerked the trigger on last month’s mudslide of phony protests – nationwide — at town hall meetings of Republican legislators, it is entirely logical for President Trump to suspect the shadowy ex-president of wiretapping at Mr. Trump’s Trump Tower headquarters.
Especially in view of Mr. Obama’s teeth-baring hatred of the president, here is an immaculate example of the fake news Mr. Trump often cites.
He makes a charge, and the fake media mocks him instead of investigating and reporting.
This is unprecedented in American presidential history.
Two of America’s more significant newspapers did what liberals instinctively do when one of their own, especially their golden idol, is accused of a crime.
Haughtily they belch, in the tradition of The New York Times and the Los Angeles Times, glance in the mirror to verify the veracity of their sources, then mock and deny the charges to their cheated readers.
Reflection? Investigation? That is so yesterday they sniff.
What happened yesterday morning after President Trump tweeted the entirely logical accusation Saturday morning, was entirely predictable.
In Los Angeles, the Times told readers, “Nothing here, folks.”
Throwing themselves onto their sinless if under-accomplished hero, Mr. Obama, as human shields, the Times breezily reported:
“Trump Wiretap Charges Appear Baseless.”
In less than 24 hours, the Times opened and closed their own broken-pencil-lead investigation.
In New York, by sheer coincidence, the Times told its cheated readers, “Nothing here folks.”
Who needs to investigate huge accusations when you were born knowing the truth.
The Times told New York readers: “With No Proof, Trump Claims Obama Tapped. Charge of Nixon-Style Phone Monitoring.”
Michael Goodwin of the New York Post, a former Timesman, was a lonely voice for reason:
“In light of the tsunami of leaks from intelligence agencies, the president is right to suspect he is the target of a dirty game.”
Before reviewing the various instances of nonsense Mr. Obama and his aides are suspected of creating, Mr. Goodwin accurately portrays liberal strategy:
“To judge by their scattershot approach, the conspirators (against President Trump) are fishing for a bombshell. The fallback position is to inflict death by a thousand cuts.”
After four months of loose-screw shenanigans by Democrats and their little politically correct soldiers, it would be foolish to ignore the likelihood of Mr. Obama’s involvement. He has worked harder the two months to grease Mr. Trump’s path than he did in the preceding eight years.