Second of two parts
Re “Who Wants to Become a Muslim?”
It is an unbreakable liberal tradition at the Los Angeles Times that if America supports a concept, the newspaper will stand in oddball contradiction.
Since San Bernardino, normative Americans have been worried that a random strand of lunatic Muslims will attack a public event they are attending – from schoolgrounds to much larger venues.
Paternalistically patting a cluster of quiescent Muslims on their covered heads, congenitally belligerent liberals, via their inherently contrary puerile nature, scowl impatiently at normal Americans and ask “What are you fretting about?”
In a mocking manner last Sunday morning, the Times reported – in undisguised disgust – on large numbers of parents in “rural” Virginia – hillbillies, you know – protesting because their impressionable children were being taught how to write the Islamic profession of faith.
The parental uprising – a concept rare in Southern California – forced nervous educators to shut down the Virginia district of 10,000 children last Friday.
They were supposed to be learning calligraphy.
Faith ‘begorrah, Murgatroyd, how can you learn to callig without drinking in the most rudimentary principles of Islam?
Whether it was a thinly veiled attempt to promote/recruit for Islam can be debated. Just not for long.
Can you envision the foot-stomping uproar emotion-driven left-wingers would burst into if, say, the Catholic church’s creed were fed, slyly, to gullible students.
The Times’s story about the worried Virginia parents was critically headlined “Fear complicates lessons on Islam.” It was presented under the guise of news rather than opinion, the newspaper’s latest attempt to seduce its gullible, dimly aware readers into empathically embracing the religion advocated by the world’s most evil killers.
All while continuing to pat Muslims on the head, as if they were veteran house pets.
Attempting to renew his membership in the Yahoo club, Times reporter Matty Pearce, a true believer in teaching Islam to the vulnerable, proudly flashed his left-wing bona fides in ways that liberals commonly give away their biases.
He quoted two stand-alone persons and four academic projects or organizations.
Five of the six samples are liberals. But the conservative organization, buried near the rear of the story, was the only one politically labeled. Thanks, Matty. “There is no god but God, and Muhammed is his prophet.” Objectively speaking, of course.
