The most accidentally honest headline in a North American newspaper today appeared in the blushing Los Angeles Times:
“Clinton’s past unlikely to hurt her.”
No kidding.
When the Times vowed last year to sprint past the stack of nasty crimes by Hillary Clinton, the worst unpunished liar in modern American public life, there was no chance her past would hurt her in the race against Mr. Trump.
Today’s page A-7 story is loaded with liberal-soothing bombs.
Like the rapid-fire guns liberals profess to hate, the story sags with wink-wink, favorite mocking buzzwords. Such electric references are intended to make fun of the Clinton accusers — and any other person who disagrees with his betters.
Every morning, the uber-liberal Los Angeles Times fights off revealing truth with the same ferocity that four poor Southern young ladies fought off rape-like assaults by the charming Bill Clinton.
Since the victimized ladies first came to national attention in the early 1990s, these four remarkable coincidences have not mattered to our liberal betters who control America’s media.
The leftists who then and now dictate to the media, ruled that since Billy the Charmer was a fellow liberal Democrat, his nasty foibles were to be permanently ignored. If they resisted, ethical journalists would risk the potential career-ruining opprobrium of their left-wing moral minders.
Mr. Trump is accused of nasty words, Mr. Clinton of nasty acts, Mrs. Clinton of threatening at least two of the women.
Authors of printed exposures of the extreme follies of Bill and Hillary are treated like crazy-uncles-in-training.
Therefore you do not have to rank higher than a first-grader to guess who is the villain of the Times’s one-sided story that seems to make fun of the women accusers for daring to scuff the rep of Billy the Charmer.
That would be Donald Trump.
In unprecedented volleys, the shameless Times has been assassinating him daily in print while ignoring Hillary’s outrageous behavior.
In the process, the “newspaper” has been celebrating farce each morning, cooking Mr. Trump, making fools of its readers and turning traditional, serious journalism on its head.
