Scandalous Vote Swaps

The City — The illustrious attorney Mickey Kantor of the mega law firm Mayer Brown formed a fancy-shmancy committee of poobahs back in 2013 to figure out what was wrong with the city of Los Angeles. Contrary to the proclamations of our new mayor that he had revitalized everything, this gaggle of self-appointed VIPs discovered that the city was going to rack and ruin. It wrote:

“Los Angeles is barely treading water while the rest of the world is moving forward. We risk falling further behind in adapting to the realities of the 21st century and becoming a City in decline.” 

When time rolled around to fix the problem, the 2020 Commission became the Zero Zero Commission. It had nothing.

Now, we read about all sorts of solutions in the L.A. Times, LA Weekly and CityWatch. Borrow $1.2 billion to build homes for the people we just made homeless by tearing down their homes. Better yet, how about a $120 billion tax increase for more subways, when, with each billion dollars we spend on transit, a smaller percent of the public actually uses mass transit?

The cause of the city’s ruin can be viewed three times a week on TV. All we have to do is tune to the City Council’s live feed or to Channel 35 and we can watch criminality in action. Mickey Kantor is right: the city of Los Angeles is in decline, but there was no reason for him to keep the origin of our municipal woes a secret. His commission just lacked the guts to admit the truth. The Los Angeles City Council operates under an unlawful vote trading pact that Penal Code 86 criminalized a decade ago in 2006.

The Public Should Know

The vote-trading pact is the old “I’ll scratch your back if you scratch my back” trade-off. No Councilmember will vote “No” on any project in another Council member’s district. In return, no Council member will vote “No” on any project in his or her district. As a result, any project that a Councilmember places on the City Council agenda unanimously passes. They’ve got a 99.9 percent unanimous passage rate.

This is not passage by a mere majority vote – this unlawful “voting pact” requires that every single councilmember who is present must vote “Yes” every single time. It does not matter how many laws a project may break — it gets unanimous approval. It does not matter how many millions of dollars in gifts the developer gets — there is unanimous approval. It does not matter if the city treasury cannot pay for roads or sidewalks because the developers are draining the coffers. Each project gets unanimous approval. The overriding concern of the City Council is that every Council member has every one of these special deals with his special friends unanimously approved.

Of course, almost nothing works in the city, and naturally we have too little money for pension funds, streets or paramedics. Yet, the Council members always get unanimous approval for whatever gifts they want for their special friends – no questions asked. Literally, no Council member ever asks another Council member if giving millions of dollars to CIM Group for 5929 Sunset is a wise idea.

The city’s rotten core, its criminal vote trading system, continues on many fronts:

• If a Council member’s buddy wants to construct twin skyscrapers straddling an earthquake fault line, he’s got it – unanimously.
• If a Council member’s buddy wants $14 or $20 million for his Hollywood high-rise which the courts closed down for being illegally constructed, he’s got it – unanimously.
• If Council member Krekorioan’s buddy wants to tear down Marilyn Monroe’s historic home in Valley Village three days before the Cultural Heritage Commission meets, he’s got it – unanimously.
• If Council member Mitch O’Farrell wants to continue evicting the elderly, disabled and the poor from their rent-controlled apartments so his buddies can continue to create more high-end, luxury boutiques for the rich and famous, he’s got it – unanimously.
• If Council member Wesson wants all the sales tax revenue at the CIM Midtown Project to go to CIM Group and not to the city, he’s got – unanimously.
•  If a Council member wants the millions of dollars of hotel taxes from its Grand Hotel to go to his buddy, aka Korean Airlines, he’s got it – unanimously.

It does not matter what project a Council member wants or how much the project will drain the city treasury, the Council member gets it – unanimously.

Closing the Circle

Let’s go back to Mickey Kantor and his report from 2013. It continued:

“As a consequence, Los Angeles is sinking into a future in which it no longer can provide the public services to which our people’s taxes entitle them and where the promises made to public employees about a decent and secure retirement simply cannot be kept. City revenues are in long-term stagnation and expenses are climbing.” 

What is the city’s response when someone complains about the criminal vote trading agreement? The city claims that it is above the law. The city says that it is none of the courts’ business how the city conducts its internal affairs. It claims that it does not have to follow Penal Code § 86 because the Mental Processes of the Council members are confidential and privileged.

The city’s claim is far more than Council members asserting the Fifth Amendment. It claims that no one may present any evidence in court from which a jury could infer that a Council member had a criminal state of mind. King Louis XIV of France made the same assertion when he claimed, “L’etat c’est moi’” (I am the state).

In line with its grandiose belief, the city claims that the state has no power to enforce its laws setting the limits on how cities may govern themselves. The state can pass all the laws it wants, but the city denies that the courts have the right to adjudicate whether the city is following the law.

The city claims that it is solely a matter of politics, and courts may not hear cases that involve politics. The fancy word for this weird idea is “justiciable.” The city asserts that the question of whether or not city councilmembers engage in criminal vote trading is a non-justiciable issue. It is not the court’s role “to dictate the manner in which councilmembers choose to vote.” The city asserts that the courts are impotent in the face of this massive, decade’s long criminal vote trading agreement that has brought disaster upon the city.

So now, you know why the 2020 Commission turned tail and ran away. The city insists that the only law it has to follow is the law it wants to follow. In fact, the city claims that it does not even have to follow its own rules and procedures. Why? Because the courts may not second-guess what the city actually does.

So we Angelenos can forget about exalted commissions. We can forget about the Neighborhood Councils or submitting our comments to challenge construction projects. We can forget about the Neighborhood Integrity Initiative. We can forget about everything because the fix is in.

The role given to us Angelenos is simple – approve hundreds of billions of dollars of bonds, rate hikes, and tax increases so that each City Council member has an endless supply of money to dole out to his friends.

This essay originally appeared in www.citywatchla.com

Mr. Abrams, a Los Angeles attorney, may be contacted at Rickleeabrams@Gmail.com.