Home OP-ED Garcetti Reappoints ‘Arrogant’ Commissioner

Garcetti Reappoints ‘Arrogant’ Commissioner

216
0
SHARE
Mr. Wolfson. Photo: City Watch LA

The Guss Report — Mayor Garcetti has reappointed Roger Wolfson to the L.A. Animal Services Commission. An attorney and television writer whose last IMDB credit was in 2012, Mr. Wolfson had no qualifications or prior experience when first appointed.

Since that time he has failed to consistently attend the twice monthly meetings or do much of the work of a Commissioner except for his self-described “personal” humane pursuits.

“He’s so arrogant that [he] can’t seem to be bothered to show up at all very often,” said Marla Tauscher, an attorney involved in humane affairs inside and outside of the city, and who recently filed suit against the Commission. “In the last four meetings I’ve attended, he hasn’t been at three and was late to the fourth. If he’s so busy he can’t make it, he should resign. It’s not as if we can’t live without his searing insight.”

Ms. Tauscher is right.

In 2015, of the 22 Commission meetings that Mr. Wolfson was supposed to attend, he was either absent (4x) or late (5x) 41 percent of the time. And it is tough to tell whether he rolled out of bed in time for the 10 a.m. and occasional 7 p.m. meetings in 2014 because he refuses to force the Commission to post the meeting minutes for that year, 76 percent of which are still missing from the Animal Services website.

In 2014, Mr. Wolfson did offer a written observation about Animal Services before he acknowledged that he was warned that one does not criticize Animal Services when on the Commission.

“(Animal Services is) a leaking rowboat, Dan. No way to plug all the holes at once. I’m doing my best,” he wrote in an Aug. 28, 2014 email.

To date, Mr. Wolfson’s “best” resulted in none of those holes being plugged or even addressed honestly, including:

  • The 8,807 pet “adoptions” that the city falsified by simply shuffling animals among cages in city-owned buildings, while Mr. Garcetti falsely told the public that “adoptions were up.”
  • The inconsistently applied $25 drop off fee that is written in Animal Services policy for people bringing an animal to a city shelter, while Mr. Garcetti falsely told the public that “impounds are down.”
  • Failure to enforce no pet sales laws or to determine why breeder permits are available to anyone who wishes to breed their animals, including pits and Chihuahuas, the two breeds most often killed by Animal Services.
  • Failure to pick up stray animals reported to Animal Services.
  • Inability to collect millions of dollars in annual dog licensing revenue, including from Mr. Wolfson himself, who failed to pay his dog license fees to the city until he was first appointed by Mr. Garcetti, and even then, only for the present year due. According to Animal Services records, his obligation remains unpaid, as are his unassessed late fees that others, including City Council president Herb Wesson, are charged when it was determined that he, too, was delinquent.

Mr. Wolfson’s delinquency is treated differently than was that of his predecessor Ruthanne Secunda, a wealthy literary agent who was terminated from the appointment when it was discovered that she voted on city leash and licensing laws while disregarding both herself.

Councilmember Paul Koretz, at that time, wrote in an email, “A Commissioner violating a leash law and license law that she voted on or at least clearly knew about is unacceptable. The fact that she acted once she was caught and licensed her animals shouldn’t impress anyone…. Your commissioner is an idiot and absolutely should go.” 

Later in Mr. Koretz’s email, he erroneously referred to me as a “moron” for pointing out Ms. Secunda’s failures, and somehow concluded that it was a criticism of the Animal Services G.M. Note: Mr. Koretz at first denied writing the email, but apologized in person after being shown a copy of it.

At the last Commission meeting that Mr. Wolfson actually attended, he called for more nighttime meetings that are held at the local shelters, but simultaneously tried to reduce the amount of speaking time that local attendees could use to share their concerns, rendering such meetings moot. Why have meetings in the community if you are not dedicated to listening to the community?

Mr. Wolfson, who did not respond to requests for comment for this article, also admitted the emotional atmosphere in the shelter is so “intense” that sometimes he can’t go back for several weeks.

Mr. Guss, MBA, is a contributor to Huffington Post, KFI-AM 640, Los Angeles Times, Los Angeles Daily News and other publications. He writes for www.citywatchla.com

He blogs on humane issues at http://ericgarcetti.blogspot.com/.

Facebook Twitter Google+

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

CAPTCHA: Please Answer Question Below: *