Home OP-ED Complex Reasons Bibi Stayed Home

Complex Reasons Bibi Stayed Home

189
0
SHARE
Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses the American Israel Public Affairs Committee policy conference in Washington, March 2, 2015. (photo by REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst)

To explain Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu’s decision to forego a meeting with President Obama, associates of the prime minister noted to Al-Monitor.com the U.S. primaries and Mr. Netanyahu’s desire to avoid being dragged into the ruckus surrounding them.

While there is some truth to this excuse, given on condition of anonymity, it is not exactly high on the list of the real reasons. What is taking place in the U.S. primaries has caused great consternation to Mr. Netanyahu as well as his American political patron, casino mogul Sheldon Adelson. In contrast to the previous presidential contest, during which Mr. Adelson sank many millions into the candidacy of Newt Gingrich before skipping over to Mitt Romney’s camp and investing $100 million in him, this time, Messrs. Netanyahu and Adelson are waiting to see which way the wind would turn. The problem is that the wind has swirled in a crazy direction. No one in Mr. Netanyahu or Mr. Adelson’s circles had dreamed

Prime Minister of Donald Trump’s rise. Now they are beginning to get used to him, as reflected in the tone of the articles in Israel Hayom, the pro-Netanyahu newspaper financed by Mr. Adelson.

People to Avoid

Mr. Netanyahu decided to cancel his U.S. trip so that he could avoid meeting with both President Obama and the U.S. Jewish community.

Mr. Netanyahu had two more important reasons that induced him to skip the meeting with Mr. Obama on Friday and waive an appearance before the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) the following night. One was a diplomatic reason, the other was political-religious.

The diplomatic reason is connected to the discussion over a memorandum of understanding between Israel and the United States that will determine the dimensions of the military aid package from the United States to Israel in the decade starting in 2017. Currently, Israel receives about $3 billion a year in security aid. Following the nuclear agreement with Iran, Israel hoped to upgrade the package to more than $4 billion. However, Mr. Netanyahu refused to open contacts while the U.S. administration was willing to meet it halfway (in the middle of last year), in order to wage his hopeless struggle against ratification of the nuclear agreement in Congress.

Now, the prime minister finds himself in a hopeless situation.

The Americans are agreeing to ramp up assistance, but not to the level that Israel wants. The gaps remain, and chances that they will be bridged are low. Israel demands $4 billion a year, not including special assistance for the development of its various interceptor programs, including the Magic Wand (David’s Sling) and the Arrow missile. They are intended to complete Israel’s aerial protection against long-range rockets and missiles. The support needed for these projects comes to hundreds of millions of dollars a year, meaning that what Israel really wants is assistance close to $5 billion, all told. The Americans are willing to enlarge the aid to about $4 billion total. This is a significant gap.

Mr. Netanyahu is still determined to postpone the agreement to the next president’s term of office, despite Vice President Joe Biden begging him last week when he was in Israel to sign it during Mr. Obama’s term of office.

Skirting an Ambush

Mr. Netanyahu has his reasons. The prime minister is concerned about a “diplomatic ambush” from Mr. Obama during his last few months in office. He fears something along the lines of the Clinton Parameters that President Bill Clinton set out in the last few days of his term of office.

Mr. Obama possesses a framework agreement formulated by Secretary of State John Kerry. The president can deliver a speech and detail the conditions of the framework agreement, a kind of “Obama Parameters.” Or he can lend his support to the French initiative at the Security Council regarding the establishment of a Palestinian state by not vetoing it.

Mr. Obama could even take an American framework agreement to the Security Council for ratification. Such acts would be viewed by Mr. Netanyahu as a real strategic catastrophe.

Mr. Netanyahu reckons that the president would find it easier to carry out such a move if a military aid package for the next decade is signed. A well-publicized signing ceremony would remove the anti-Israeli image that Mr. Netanyahu has painted on Mr. Obama in recent years.

Heat on Obama, Too

Simultaneously, it would allow the American president to leave behind a diplomatic legacy. Those close to Mr. Netanyahu assess that if the sides do not reach an agreement on military aid, it will be harder for Mr. Obama to embark on a diplomatic campaign. He will need something to show his even-handedness, Mr. Netanyahu’s people think, because he won’t want to harm Hillary Clinton’s chances at the presidency and he won’t want to go down in history as an anti-Israeli president.

Mr. Netanyahu, a cautious and calculating leader for most of his career, has become an out-of-control gambler in the last two years. Success has gone to his head and his closeness to Mr. Adelson and his unlimited financial resources have given him a false sense of security.

After he lost his wager on presidential candidate Mitt Romney, Mr. Netanyahu went on to fail in his Iranian policy and then gambled again to try to avert congressional authorization of the agreement. He failed yet again — but each time he keeps raising the bar one more notch.

An Israeli minister told Al-Monitor last week on condition of anonymity that Mr. Netanyahu is endangering Israel’s most important strategic interests. “It could happen that Trump will be president, and he’ll reassess the whole business of American support all over the world. We could even find ourselves with zero support due to Netanyahu’s shenanigans,” he said.

To avoid finding himself being dragged into signing the memorandum, Mr. Netanyahu decided to miss the presidential meeting. At the moment, his coalition is more important to him than military aid. He founded a narrow right-wing government, and a political tremor could dismantle it.

The second reason that impelled him not to travel to the United States at this time is also connected to these political interests: In January, the Israeli government reached a historic compromise and allotted Reform and Conservative Jews a special, separate prayer space opposite the Western Wall, Judaism’s holiest site.

This compromise passed a government vote, but also let an ancient genie out of its bottle. The ultra-Orthodox parties, without whom Mr. Netanyahu cannot maintain his government, are now threatening to dismantle the coalition unless he agrees to their demand to amend this historic agreement.

This is the same agreement that is viewed by world Jewry as a reconciliatory step taken by the Jewish state controlled by an Orthodox establishment with most of the world’s Jews, who are Reform or Conservative.

Mr. Netanyahu knows that if he attends the AIPAC conference at the end of this week, he would receive a warm and festive public welcome from the Reform and Conservative Jews. But it would be a dangerous bear hug.

Mr. Netanyahu is a secular Jew, even a borderline atheist, and has no interest in all this hullabaloo. His worldview is decidedly non-Orthodox, but he is an experienced politician and his coalition would fall apart without the ultra-Orthodox. He fell into this trap against his will. At the moment, he has no idea how to get through this impasse. The last thing he needs now is a public show of support by Reform Jewry, which will only further enrage his natural ultra-Orthodox coalition partners.

Mr. Netanyahu understands that sometimes, the best thing to do is simply stay home, disengage and pray for a miracle.

Ben Caspit is a columnist for Al-Monitor’s Israel Pulse. He is also a senior columnist and political analyst for Israeli newspapers, and has a daily radio show and regular TV shows on politics and Israel. On Twitter: @BenCaspit

Read more

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

CAPTCHA: Please Answer Question Below: *