If Islam is your religion and your lifestyle, and you want to be a terrorist when you grow up, skip America.
Try England, Hungary, Paris – then you will become instantly infamous.
Attack the United States and the 98 percent of boy journalists who are liberal will throw their bodies on top of yours, crying out “nothing here.”
Aggressively, the liberals will seek to smother to smithereens the daffy notion that the latest dastardly terrorist act was perpetrated by one more crazy Muslim.
Take this morning, for example.
In the wake of Abdul the Somalian’s attempt to butcher 11 of his fellow Ohio State students yesterday, America’s most august journal, The New York Times, downgraded the crime of the thankfully dead Muslim monster to the No. 5 story on page 1.
That was a loud burp compared to other coverage.
In the Los Angeles Times, Angry Abdul’s bid for ill-gotten fame was considerably less successful.
The Times’s consistent bizarre far-left contention that radical Islam is not a threat to our way of life informs their editorial policy. The Times – you will excuse the verb – buried Abdul’s terrorism not on page 2, not on page 3, not on page 4, not on page 5, not on page 6, but page 7 – behind Betty Crocker recipes and a bulletin on the next Girl Scouts cookie sale coming to your neighborhood.
Jaded liberals hope to paint President-elect Trump as a greater threat to Muslims than radical Islamists are to you and me. Ask the 11 Ohio State students.
