The School Board unanimously passed a resolution declaring all School District campuses as safe zones.
The Board vowed not to allow law enforcement agents looking to deport those without documentation on its campuses without a review process.
Language in the resolution makes it clear District schools are safe spaces for the diverse students and families the District serves – from every walk, talk, country and religion there is.
The District is widely known as one of the most diverse in the state, something it has long celebrated.
Students in the District are 35 percent Hispanic, 25 percent white, 25 percent black and 15 Asian.
School Board President Steve Levin said the Safe Zones resolution is a critical component to making sure students and their families are comfortable on campus, able to move ahead with the District’s primary charge.
“Our responsibility is to educate the students,” he said. “That’s harder to do if they are living in fear of deportation or persecution.
“We want every single child in CCUSD to know that we will do everything in our power to keep them safe and secure.
“Every child in Culver City needs to know that they can trust every member of the CCUSD family, and this resolution is one attempt to make that clear.”
Board member Anne Allaire echoed those sentiments.
“To learn, children and adolescents need to feel safe and supported,” she said. “It is essential that we have a resolution that explicitly outlines our shared commitment to the conditions of safety – physical, social, and emotional – for our students and in our schools.
“I wholeheartedly support this resolution that expresses our dedication to create an atmosphere of sincere support for the social/emotional well-being and academic success of our students.”
The resolution, officially entitled “Success For All Means Safety For All: Culver City Unified School District Campuses as Safe Zones and Resource Centers for Students and Families” also encourages the superintendent to increase and enhance partnerships with community-based organizations and legal services organizations who provide resources for families facing deportation, registration and/or other civil rights restrictions.
It aimed to develop a rapid response network to assist any affected children and their family members.
The resolution:
- Requires federal agents to only be on campus after a thorough review and decision made by the superintendent and the School District’s legal counsel
- Continues to protect a student’s immigration status, religion, disability, or sexual orientation by not allowing staff members to ask for that information
- Creates resource and information sites for students and their families on each campus to address issues of civil rights
Asks all schools to treat students equitably, including those receiving free and reduced lunches, transportation and other services.
Standing Together
“I am proud to stand with my fellow Board members in defense of the civil rights of our students and families,” Board member Sue Robins said. “As a school district, our role is to provide an outstanding education to every student that walks through our doors and ensure that our students are safe and unimpeded in their access to all that we have to offer them.”
While the Board made clear that students should feel safe on campuses regardless of who is in the White House, Board member Kathy Paspalis made it clear the resolution’s timing was a direct result of the divisive rhetoric that permeated the recent presidential election.
“We have an obligation, first and foremost, to ensure, to the extent possible, the health and safety of our students,” she said. “The incoming administration has raised a specter of justifiable fear and anxiety in much of our country, and, closer to home, in many of our students and staff.
“As such, we will do what we can to allay those fears and protect our CCUSD community, just as others of goodwill are stepping up all over this country to do the same in their communities.”
Culver City is not the first district to approve a similar resolution. Since the Election Day, districts across the country, from San Francisco Unified to Montgomery County, MD, have moved swiftly to take a leadership role in protecting their students.
“It’s a challenging time to be in policy-making,” said Board member Kelly Kent. “It can be even more intense, as a School Board member, when considering that the people perhaps most effected by any potential federal policy changes are K-12 students.
“In light of this though, I’m grateful to be serving on a team of individuals who are championing safety for our students without reservation or fear of political reprisal.
“I feel a sense of great optimism, because I am surrounded by Board members and Bistrict leadership that truly understand the relationship between psychological well-being and academic opportunity.”
The complete resolution and the District’s plans for dealing with any inquiries regarding immigration or other status of students and/or their families will be shared with parents and students so they are aware of their rights.
“I sincerely hope the CCUSD community feels a greater sense of security as a result of this resolution’s passing,” Dr. Kent added. “I hope they will also continue to reach out with explicit demands corresponding to changing needs in a changing political climate.
“We can only know how best to serve if we are informed directly by the populations most impacted by what’s ahead.”
Mr. Maleman may be contacted at gmaleman@aol.com
To the school board:
Very disappointing. The school board has chosen to disobey the law. The school board doesn’t have that discretion. It can’t pick and choose which laws to obey and which to disobey.
What exactly are the students taught in school? Are they taught civics? The Constitution? The structure of our government? The rule of law? How to be good citizens?
Aren’t the school board members required to take an oath to uphold the law?
By your action, aren’t you sending a message to the students that they can decide to disobey a lawful order from law enforcement? Have you ever heard of the “slippery slope”?
This irresponsible action is unlawful and is the opposite of what the purpose of the school district is supposed to do.
Shame on the school board.
Finally, the board is jeopardizing federal funds by this action.