Defending the morals and ethics faithfully lived by Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch scarcely differs from standing stoutly for a moon because it is yellow or for a sky that is blue.
Desperate Democrats have chased their tails – yes, all Dems have tails to partner with their Russian fairy tales – for two months.
They still are mad that, based on tradition, B. Hussein Obama last year was denied the chance to name the late Justice Scalia’s successor.
Sweatily they have searched for a nick in the unflawed surface of Judge Gorsuch’s soul and struck out.
The final score was the same as was every time the boys hunted for B. Hussein Obama’s intellectual resources.
Zero to zero.
Even as former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi recovers this week from her lucky 13th facelift and Sen. Chuck Schumer recuperates from recent surgery to remove his good sense, both have been railing like 6-year-olds in a sandbox.
Resembling the anvil chorus from Joe’s Seedy Bar for Middle Class Liberals, Mr. Schumer and Ms. Pelosi, leaders of their factions in Congress, contend that the judge is not a mainstream thinker. They disagree with his notion that immigration laws were made to be followed, not winked at.
Undisciplined, Mr. Schumer and Ms. Pelosi are ignoring sage advice to let this nomination pass and load up for the nominee President Trump will choose to succeed Radical Ruthie Ginsberg.
Even USA Today, which thinks Adam Schiff is a full-grown man, choked this morning on an overdose of hot chocolate laced with stale bourbon, burped and endorsed Judge Gorsuch.
Reluctantly.
U., as the newspaper prefers to be known due to a shortage of erasers, called the brilliant jurist “one of the least objectionable things Trump has done since taking office.”
This is what you say when you accidentally press the Empty button after turning to your mind for a slice of insight.