Under California law, a city charter can be amended by majority vote. Nothing we say in the Culver City charter will alter this fact. It therefore seemed misleading to retain language that pretends that a super majority will be required before certain changes can be made.

     The decision to remove this language was consistent with one of the goals of the Committee, to have a charter that everyone can understand.

     The Charter Review Committee took its responsibilities very seriously.  After a year of hearings and study, we unanimously concluded that the proposed new charter sets forth the best possible governing structure for our city. It does so with language that is clear and straight forward.

 

     It seems unfortunate that the opponents of Measure V spend time during the debates trying to obscure what will be accomplished by the proposed charter. They also criticize language changes that were made for the purpose of having the charter accurately reflect what rights Culver City voters have under California law.

     I hope everyone takes a careful look at the proposed new charter (which can be seen on Culver City’s web page or at www.YesonV.cc).

     If you do, I am sure you will join me in voting yes on Measure V on April 11.

John Kuechle, Culver City