Classroom Equality: 4 Whites, 4 Blacks, 4 Hispanics, 4 Asians

Ari L. NoonanEditor's Essays

Pompous Gary (Don’t Tilt Me) Orfield of UCLA is not my friend. Hopefully he never will be. A drive-by liberal racist, Mr. Orfield proudly leads expeditions in search of racism. If the facts won’t cooperate, his imagination will.
 
How fitting that over Memorial Day weekend, when we honor our bravest heroes, this race-baiting academic shoves his sweaty self into the front row.
 
Mr. Orfield has just completed a “study” in which he proclaims that all K-12 classrooms should contain the identical number of blacks, Hispanics, whites and Asians. For icing, their daddies, whether in jail or out, should earn the same-sized paychecks and their mommies should  speak a common language. Otherwise, Mr. Orfield and his anti-social ilk will take umbrage.
 
If there are 13 whites and 12 blacks in a class, Mr. Orfield, owner of an unbusy life, leaps to his feet and bellows “racism.” Like lemmings, good little fellow liberals cohere about him.  Tugging at their “Death to Donny Sterling” tee-shirts, the Orfield Orfs stamp their feet and cry “America is racist.”
 
Surely you do not have to reflect before adamantly rejecting this rednecked racism cloaked in flowing black academic robes.
 
The smallness of the liberal Mr. Orfield’s mind is staggering, exactly the ingrained bigotry that Dr. King sought to destroy 50 years ago. Little could Dr. King have foreseen that once historic racism had been largely defeated, social snakes such as Mr. Orfield would slither into respectable halls of learning and spew their dastardly nonsense, which their naive students obediently would swallow.
  
Chaos, Here He Comes
 
As co-director of The Civil Rights Project at UCLA, Mr. Orfield is co-author of a race-laced “study” that means to pit professional black and brown victims against standard-issue Americans of all colors. As a liberal, the bitter Mr. Orfield regards succinctness as his enemy, though by no means his only one. His “study” lugubriously is labeled “Segregating California’s Future: Inequality and Its Alternative 60 Years After Brown v. Board of Education.” 
 
The themed title meant Mr. Orfield would not put down his hunting guns until he could “prove” his thesis: That whites and Asians have conspired to make blacks and browns ragingly poor, irretrievably ignorant, worryingly insecure.
 
Peanut Butter Data
 
The drivel-driven pseudo-academic has deduced that 51percent of Hispanics attend schools where whites are 10 percent or less of the enrollment. Huh? What did he say?
 
He says 39 percent of blacks attend schools where whites are 10 percent or less. Is that good, bad or a cheeseburger with everything on it? Should anyone over the age of 10 care?
 
Shouldn’t this chap be thinking up hamburgers at McDonald’s?
 
Mr. Orfield worships each morning at the shrine of victocrats, as Larry Elder has derisively branded the fervently dedicated deadbeats who waste their lives trying to stir up the masses.
 
“What we have seen for Latinos is an incredible increase in isolation from white and Asian students, and an extremely high exposure to poverty,” says Mr. Orfield, as if he were a ventriloquist’s dummy. What did he say? Why is it significant?
 
Liberal gobbledegook.
 
Here is Mr. Orfield at his I Am a Victim best:
 
“We see a significant exposure to linguistic segregation, which we call triple segregation (after race and income levels). It has gotten much worse.”

 Oh, the pity of it all.

Now you see why the Democrat party core is comprised of low-brow whites, blacks and browns, the more complicated walking across the aisle.