Re “Out-of-Town Council Members Stand up for Unpopular Rocha”
[Editor’s Note: A retired professor comments on the administrative chaos at Pasadena City College, where President Mark Rocha’s unpopular governance methods have been openly under fire since last November from organized students and fulltime faculty members.]
[img]1769|right|Dr. Mark Rocha||no_popup[/img]As one who taught at Pasadena City College for 40 years, I was personally involved in the establishment of state-mandated shared government procedures (AB 1725), which require that faculty, staff and students be significantly involved in matters that affect them, including the presidential hiring process—and that presents a “problem” for the Board of Trustees.
The Board adheres to shared-governance law by creating a Search Committee representing a cross-section of the college as well as the community. But then, it entirely ignores the recommendations. Why? Because the Board of Trustees does not want a president who is responsive to constituents.
Such an individual is too “soft.” They want a top-down decision-maker and a fiscal policy that results in large budget surpluses rather than qualitative service to the community. This explains their emphasis (and President Mark Rocha’s) upon “large-group instruction” and online courses with high student-teacher ratios and assembly-line methods of instruction
It also explains the increasing use of part-timers (violating the state-mandated rule that 75 percent of classes must be taught by full-timers), since adjunct faculty receive relatively low wages, no fringe benefits and are easier to control because they do not have tenure.
Thus, the Board of Trustees sometimes scrapes the bottom of the barrel when hiring CEOs, a practice that goes back to the 1980s when former professor Dr. Gordon Brown and I went to court to expose the dirty laundry of former President Dr. Richard Meyers and continued with President Dr. Paulette Perfumo.
Now we have Dr. Rocha, whose fiscal responsibility and ethical demeanor were questioned two years ago in the Los Angeles Times series on waste and corruption in the L.A. community college system.
Will the Board continue to ignore the consensus among the students and faculty as expressed in their recent votes of no- confidence?
