If Swish Obama had run as a Republican in ’08 instead of a Democrat, he never would have been elected President or been allowed to run. As a black left-winger, he was immune from even casual scrutiny. His many skeletons went uninvestigated since he is on the side of the good guys. The vile people Swish was close with in his pre-Washington years compounded by his near-comatose work record would have made him a deserved zero in the Hillary race.
Conversely, if Rick Santorum were a Democrat, he probably would be the runaway choice to win the White House in November. Three years older than Swish, Mr. Santorum’s work record makes mysterious Swish look like a thumbsucker. The Angry Left can’t admit that, though, because the 95 percent of brainwashed blacks who are Democrats would desert them.
Put Away the Axes, Boys
In the six days since Mr. Santorum’s eye-popping finish in the Iowa caucuses, The New York Times and the wannabe Los Angeles Titanic have committed daily out-front character assassinations against Mr. Santorum.
Last Monday, 13 out of 200 polled Americans could correctly spell Rick Santorum’s name. All 200 can tell you today that the loathsome child-killing, wife-beating, tobacco-spitting, dog-kicking, lying, partner-cheating Mr. Santorum should be in prison being rehabilitated instead of racing for the Presidency.
If America’s most liberal/influential organs have their way, at the end of tomorrow’s New Hampshire primary, Mr. Santorum will hand over his wallet of ill-gotten gains to his long-suffering wife, pivot, sneak out the back door in his grubby sneakers, crawl into a filthy, half-full garbage can, pull the lid on after him, and squirm in uneasy peace until decent people decide the national election.
The astonishing lies, distortions and hyperbolic claims written about Mr. Santorum by the journalistic whores of the Angry Left at the Titanic and the Times would keep a staff of clergy and cops monopolized until their retirement.
Once Mr. Santorum became a factor in the Presidential race, the sputtering, journalistic whores of the Angry Left — secretly envious of conservatives’ happy, contented demeanor — began arguing with each other. Where should they spend their energy — denigrating Mr. Santorum’s chances of capturing the nomination or lying about his private and professional lives?
Hit Him and Low
Unable to decide, they went for mocking him in both arenas.
Liberals have made a career out of envying conservatives for their professional successes, financial acuity, good looks, clarity, certitude, and stable, traditional family lives.
You could have wagered your oldest child that this headline would show up in the savagery they would visit on Mr. Santorum:
“Raking It in: Santorum’s Income Has Soared Since Leaving Congress”(Huffington Post)
At the Titanic, girl-assassin Robin (Lawdy, I Hate Dem Dere Ree-publicans) Abcarian is one of the meanest Angry Lefties in hometown print. Striving for characteristic objectivity, the second sentence of her Page 1 Thursday story read, “He said gay marriage could lead to bestiality.” Not exactly. But, hey, liberals lie. Given Ms. Abcarian’s record for distortion, I challenge her to tell us what he actually said.
A don’t look-at-me-sideways rad feminist, Ms. Abcarian said in sentence No. 3, “He blamed ‘radical feminism’ for women going to work at the expense of children.” Ms. Abcarian, we presume, faults Frank McCourt.
As you know, black, white and polka-dot libs are race- obsessed. When they arise in the morning, they step to a mirror to see if they are still the same color. A favorite toy of the journalistic whores is to compare Mr. Santorum to the liberally reviled Pat Buchanan. Both are so Catholic and so darned public about their moral beliefs that the Angry Left, anti-religious, finds it sickening.
The hateful Ms. Abcarian’s struggling colleague Ron Brownstein committed a beaut in Friday’s edition.
Determined to identify Mr. Santorum as the disgusting latter-day twin of Mr. Buchanan, whom he calls extreme for his moral convictions, you can almost hear Brownie straining and heaving as he writes:
“Santorum doesn’t reprise Buchanan’s suspicion of international engagement, and generally doesn’t use language as racially charged as Buchanan sometimes did.”
Keep diggin’, Brownie Boy. You’ll find something.
Voila.
“But he closely follows Buchanan’s mold in his mix of unstinting social conservatism and economic nationalism. With equal passion, Santorum pledges to end abortion and revive American manufacturing.”
Brownie’s erudite response: He mocks Mr. Santorum and then descends into another racial diatribe. How educational.
One More Irritant
Mr. Santorum is the father of seven, which vexes envious, intentionally childless liberals. You probably would have to interview 35 married liberals — no easy chore in a town smaller than New York — to accumulate an aggregate of seven children of liberals.
