Home OP-ED Mozilla Is on Fire — Ordered to Burn All ‘I Like Eich’...

Mozilla Is on Fire — Ordered to Burn All ‘I Like Eich’ Signs, Then Eich

211
0
SHARE

[img]2538|right|Brendan Eich||no_popup[/img]While global warming — climate change, if you prefer its married name – is the scam of the century, the most humorous phrase to be vengefully coined lately by the angry, hopelessly insecure boys on the radical Tolerant Left is “marriage equality.”

Mechanical Tolerant Leftists repeat it as inarguable truth, as if they were perched on a ventriloquist’s knee.
The gay and straight Tolerant Left, ironically largely comprised of single guys, could not accept the mere term “marriage.” That would indicate, horrors, that traditionalists are their peers. Their congenital emotional insecurity would not allow for that.

What makes this afternoon’s story about yesterday’s firing of Mozilla co-founder Brendan Eich so tragically hilarious – because in 2008 he donated $1,000 to the anti-gay marriage Prop. 8 campaign – is that this crowd of intolerant singles preaches daily that diversity should be America’s chief value, its lone hope for redemption. (Mozilla makes the browser Firefox.)

Like President Obama, his fellow Tolerant Leftists don’t believe most of what they say. Cynically, they propagate it daily on most television networks and 98 percent of newspapers. Robotically, media stenographers, not a skeptical Tolerant Left-wing bone in their bodies, parrot the message. This way, the President gains kudos and votes. The gay and straight Tolerant Left recruit fresh new low-information supporters. Those who don’t agree are mocked in the Tolerant Left-wing Los Angeles Titanic and elsewhere as suckers. The Titanic passed on the Eich story this morning. They correctly feared it would reflect negatively on their fellow Tolerant Leftists.

Tolerant Left-wing USA Today painted lipstick today on this pig of a story, saying, with inaccurate deceptiveness: “Mozilla CEO Brendan Eich will step down following uproar over his opposition to gay marriage.”

Slate.com must be a terrific place to work, where Tolerant Leftist good guys thrive. One William (I Value Tolerance) Saletan of Slate, under the headline “Purge the Bigots,” wrote: “Brendan Eich is just the beginning. Let’s oust everyone (all 35,000 Californians) who donated to the campaign against gay  marriage.”

William’s tolerant colleague Will (I, Too, Am a Beacon of Tolerance) Oremus, wrote, with admirable restraint: “If you’re against gay marriage, you’re a bad CEO.”

Hopefully, Will and William will survive the rigors of life long enough to mature.

(Pssst, Murgatroyd. If you will fetch the matches while I quickly build a stake, we can start burning the most open-minded of our fellow citizens.)

A plain-looking feminist (is that a superfluity?) named, plainly, Mitchell (I Am the Most Tolerant) Baker, is described as Mozilla’s executive chairwoman, which, sadly, only removes her by one letter from being the “executive charwoman.”

Anyway, Mitch Baby, after elbowing Mr. Eich of his chair, issued some chicken gumbo soup that only could have been thought up by a Tolerant Leftist:

Mozilla prides itself on being held to a different standard and, this past week, we didn’t live up to it. We know why people are hurt and angry, and they are right: it’s because we haven’t stayed true to ourselves. We didn’t act like you’d expect Mozilla to act. We didn’t move fast enough to engage with people once the controversy started. We’re sorry. We must do better.”

Would the ineffable Mitch Baby think us racists if we dispatched men in white coats to her Silicon Valley hideout for a sanity test?
 
Our organizational culture reflects diversity and inclusiveness. We welcome contributions from everyone regardless of age, culture, ethnicity, gender, gender-identity, language, race, sexual orientation, geographical location and religious views. Mozilla supports equality for all.

We have employees with a wide diversity of views. Our culture of openness extends to encouraging staff and community to share their beliefs and opinions in public. This is meant to distinguish Mozilla from most organizations and hold us to a higher standard. But this time we failed to listen, to engage, and to be guided by our community.”