Home OP-ED Message to Sen. Lieu: Take Care of Non-Furry Californians, Too

Message to Sen. Lieu: Take Care of Non-Furry Californians, Too

186
0
SHARE

Since setting up “Ted Lieu Watch,” I have exposed the legal and political interests of state Sen. Ted Lieu (D-Torrance). From his attempt to triple California's car tax, to the minor arguments about tanning salons, abandoned ships, and all of those bills about animals – protecting bears from hunting dogs, micro-chipping pets, banning private pet sales – more Californians should wonder whether Lieu needs to be recalled, held accountable, or kicked out of office.

Chasing Bears and Businesses

California has high taxes, higher regulations, and maximal spending problems. Lieu wants to protect bears from being chased up a tree, while businesses are being chased out of the state because of high taxes and regulations. While Lieu is looking out for puppies, our pupils suffer in sub-standard schools. He prevents minors from using tanning salons, but public sector unions are burning generous pensions and benefits out of dwindling city coffers. While protecting abandoned ships, Lieu still claims that the California budget is balanced although numerous sources suggest that those rosy projections will turn into thorny deficits.

After contacting Lieu's office this past week, I headed for the Beverly Garland Hotel in North Hollywood, where the League of Humane Voters was holding its second annual Los Angeles Mayoral Convention. Sen. Lieu would received the “Senator of the Year” award for his efforts on behalf of animals.
 
While I spoke with league activists, some shared their disbelief about balanced budgets, too. I espied Sen. Lieu in the back of the room. Unwilling to approach him while he was speaking with supporters, he suddenly came to me, and shook my hand. Right away, I let loose about taxes, spending and other subjects. He did correct me about the shark fin bill,
which he opposed. Still, I hammered him about attempting to triple our car tax. He told me what the Sacramento staffer had shared: Our transportation funding is depleted, and besides, businesses supported the tax. Even if these two elements are the case, Californians are struggling under high taxes as it is, in part because of shotgun budgeting with Prop. 30 because state legislature threatened more cuts.
 
I told him that
Rhode Island is mulling to scrap their state income tax, along with Kansas, Louisiana and Wisconsin, something California ought to consider. Lieu mentioned proposed tax credits, but the state needs across-the-board relief for all taxpayers. I reminded him of AB 160, an attempt by Assemblyman Luis Alejo (D-Watsonville) to exempt 20,000 teamsters from the meager Sacramento pension reforms passed last year. How can anyone balance the budget with exemptions of that size flying around?

Time to Get Tense
 
Our “discussion” about the
“balanced budget” reached a fevered pitch. He grew flustered, struggling to articulate competent answers to my questions. He admitted that the legislature did not balance the budget last year. Why should anyone believe they will this year? He refused to acknowledge that all of those rosy projections will not pan out until June. So, in effect, the budget is not really balanced. I brought up the transfer of tax funds to pensions and benefits. He did not answer. I demanded a town hall meeting in Redondo Beach, where he could tell us what humane laws he will pass for us humans.

He mentioned a magic number: “Five Billion Dollar surplus. Don't take my word for it. Google it. See for yourself. The same accounting gimmicks are buoying these numbers. Sacramento legislators cannot cry “balanced” when the revenue is just “projected.”
 
Later when Lieu accepted the “Senator of the Year” award for his animal rights legislation, he claimed to support the free market. Since animals do not have a voice, they have no choice but to submit to the cruelty of corporate interests. The government needs to step in and protect them. I love animals. Animals deserve protection. But this state needs someone who will love the animal lovers, too, by passing lower taxes, fewer regulations, and less spending. What's the point of passing laws for the pets, when the pet owners cannot afford to care for them? Or when veterinary interests cannot profit from caring for them?
 
Since when has the free market failed to care for the well-being of pets and other creatures? I spoke with an activist who shared with me that a private interest purchased an animal shelter in Mission Hills, and now provides better care. Public-private partnerships can save the state millions while enforcing a culture of efficiency and respect for animals. Sen. Lieu's assertions about the limits of the free market are unsubstantiated.

After the ceremony, I pressed the state senator on drafting a school choice bill and enacting collective bargaining reforms.
 
Sen. Lieu: You need to care for all Californians, not just the furry ones.
 
Contact Sen. Lieu's office at 310.318.6994 or 916.319.2030. Tell him to set up a town hall meeting in Redondo Beach, where he can answer the following question: “When will you pass humane laws for humans?”

Arthur Christopher Schaper is a writer and blogger on issues both timeless and timely; political, cultural, and eternal. A lifelong resident of Southern California, he currently lives in Torrance. He may be contacted at arthurschaper@hotmail.com, aschaper1.blogspot.com and at asheisministries.blogspot.com. Also see waxmanwatch.blogspot.com.