Home Letters How Dreary, Frustrating Board Life Was in Pre-Zeidman Era

How Dreary, Frustrating Board Life Was in Pre-Zeidman Era

101
0
SHARE

Many of you may be new to the politics of our Board of Education.

But
 let me flash back four or five years to a previous School Board.

Imagine trying to contact your School Board member by email or 
phone, and never ever getting a response.

Imagine trying to speak
 at a public meeting, and having to wait hours – sometimes until
 after midnight – because the Board scheduled public comment at the 
very end of the meeting.

Imagine a Board of strangely-inaccessible 
and inscrutable men and women, almost all of whom didn’t even have 
children in our schools, making decisions that seemed almost
 completely out of touch with the parents and community.



Then Scott Zeidman was 
elected. He actually had kids in our school. He knew parents, and he 
worked tirelessly to interact with the community. He was the first
 School Board member ever to respond to one of my emails.

I know plenty of others who shared this same experience. It may not seem 
like a big deal, but it makes a huge difference to parents like me.

I believe Scott changed the whole culture of the School Board, from
 one of absolute inaccessibility and inscrutability to one of
 increasing openness and inclusiveness.

Public comments now are heard
 at the beginning of the meeting instead of at the end. Board members 
actually treat parents more like partners than adversaries.

There is a much greater sense that someone on that Board actually
 is listening to us (even if the Board didn’t always do what we want). 

It may not seem like
 much now, but this was a fairly revolutionary change at the time. 
Scott started that trend, which continues today with some of our
 other Board members (like Kathy Paspalis and Karlo Silbiger).

Did every single one of
 Scott’s decisions please everyone in town?

I don’t know.

But no one would challenge how hard he worked on them. 
In my mind, he did as good of a job as a leader can do. He 
listened to the public He tried to help them when he could. If he made any decision (popular or unpopular), he always had an extremely,
 well-thought-out explanation for why that decision was made.

He set 
an incredibly high standard for all other school board members to
 aspire to.

He spent hours upon hours performing the duties of 
this (almost) unpaid position.

After all of that, the public failed to
 re-elect him.

I’m devastated that 
he lost. Not just on a personal level, but on a moral and
 philosophical level.

How can someone do such a superior job and
 still be unappreciated by a majority of the voters (and non-voters)?

I think that is what troubles me the most — that, perhaps, is why 
so many people don’t vote in the first place.


Mr. Derevlany may be contacted at johnderevlany@yahoo.com