The difference between the ways the left-wing mainstream media treats Republicans and Democrats is virtually identical to the way whites in every state used to treat black people.
The principal distinction between liberals and conservatives is that the left believes that the right is not just wrong but evil while the right believes the left is merely misguided.
Another significant difference is that conservatives generally are happy and contented. The scowling left wing is in a bomb-throwing mood fulltime. Happiness, they will tell you, is for fools.
Ron Suskind, a respected Washington journalist who has a Pulitzer Prize in his saddle, has written a new best-seller (“Confidence men”) that closely, fascinatingly, honestly studies the inside of the Obama administration. It isthe only candid examination of Swish’s Presidency on the market.
My point: Mr. Suskind admitted the other day that even after Mr. Obama “wrote” two autobiographies and even after months of observing him in the same room, he is not sure what the President believes.
A three-word profile of Barack Hussein Obama:
Wishy and washy.
You could read the 10 most influential newspapers, the 20 most popular journalistic sites, and every news telecast and commentary this site of Fox and never find the trace of that conclusion.
The mainstream media’s overriding mission is to protect every hooligan and piece of rabble on the left, from the President, down or up.
The least likely Republican White House candidates have been more closely scrutinized than the worst acts Swish has committed just since his election. He hates governing the way some kids loathe homework, and, like the children, he has been embarrassingly transparent about this weakness — though journalists are human shields for his worst faults.
The East Coast journalist Michael Walsh last week wrote about liberals and their favorite weapon, the whipsaw effect, taking both sides of an issue, and then pouncing on a Republican as an idiot when he takes a stance. That way, the left never can be wrong.
This brings us to the Story of the Day that everybody on the left is talking and writing about, meaning that the l people on the right are forced to respond.
The popular site politico.com, comprised largely of ex-Washington Post journalists, learned that in the ‘90s when Herman Cain led the National Restaurant Assn., two women filed sexual harassment charges against him, and the group paid off each woman to make her go away rather than drown in obscenely expensive litigation.
Thanks to the hard-faced ladies of NOW and other angry gals have made a joke of “sexual harassment” with their commonly trump-ed-up charges.
As every astute American realizes, racism — that is public criticism of a black candidate — died the moment Mr. Cain became a candidate.
The angry, anti-analytic left has lied and covered for Swish since he became a fairly public figure almost four years ago. He is without fault, we were told, and the boys on the left have preached that gospel until the ears of normal people fell off.
But a funny thing happened on the way to Swish’s next mindless coronation:
A black candidate on the right emerged, looked uncommonly decent, and the Angry Left has been doing opposition research on him 24 hours a day ever since. They have been preparing a daily noose.
Did they find one in what yet may be another fake “sexual harassment” rap?
I don’t know.
But thedailybeast.com, another major tool of the left, laughably headlines its Cain story:
“Cain Plays the Victim Card” by blowing off the accusation.
Isn’t that racist? Nah, Mr. Cain is on the right. Oh.
The contemporary Democrat Party and Swish’s entire Presidency are founded on the whole gang playing victim in a bid for sympathy.
So far, it is working.
