Tomorrow marks the two-year anniversary of the worst international gaffe of President Obama’s administration, although heaven knows the competition is fierce, given his unapologetic distaste for the Jews of Israel.
In the hours following the fake “re-election” of the Smiling Dwarf as the “president” of Iran, June 14, 2009, thousands of brave Persians streamed into the streets to protest. They were gunned down. The world watched. The world said nothing because Muslims were doing the slaughtering.
Our courageous President showed us what his innovative credo of “leading from behind” means. Like a real man, he jammed both hands into one of his front pockets, called out “Fore!” and resumed his golf game. He said that what happened in Iran was the business of Iranians, not Americans.
His toadies in the liberal media — who slavishly ignored his numerous campaign gaffes — have maintained the same silent stance since he entered the White House, serving as dreaded human shields.
Like many willfully blind liberals, Mr. Obama, to the astonishment of normal people, sees nothing wrong with the Muslim tyrants in Iran openly constructing a nuclear bomb. They ain’t gonna take it down to the park, polish it and salute it on the 4th of July, Mr. President.
Everyone of teen age and up in the West, except for hard leftists, understands these Persian monsters mean to blow Israel and others off the planet, not least Americans.
President Obama has said numerous times, though, whatever the weapon contraption is that the Smiling Dwarf is overseeing, it is being designed for purely “peaceful purposes.” He was not smiling when he said it. You assume, therefore, that the most unfit President since Andy Johnson was serious.
Last Thursday, the Los Angeles Titanic, one of the President’s unstinting cheerleaders, with the falloff in circulation to prove it, ran an embarrassing piece, the equivalent of a latter-day Neville Chamberlain surrender gesture at the top of the op-ed page, “Engaging Iran.”
With guilelessness and naiveté that would humiliate a LAUSD student, six former ambassadors, witting fools, from the U.K., France, Italy, Belgium, Sweden an Germany made a fatuous argument. They argued that Iran is a legal entity that deserves to be treated with the same respect and lack of suspicion as any Western country. There is no evidence Iran is building a bomb because we have the government’s word.
Beware of any liberal who identifies the “international community” as the problem-solver of the world now that the American President has announced he is more comfortable “leading from behind” than in being assertive.
Sniff some of the diplomats’ Obama-flavored phrases:
• Iran “is facing the disaffection of a significant part it its population.” Oh?
• They question the U.N.-declaration that Iran’s fairly stealthy bomb-building is a “threat to peace.” They ask, “what constitutes the threat?” On the theory that bullies and tyrants have rights, the diplomats answer that Iran is justified because it lives in a “sensitive region” and should be allowed to protect itself.
• They claim, I believe falsely, that “a majority of experts, even in Israel, seems to view Iran as striving to become a threshold country, technically able to produce a nuclear weapon but abstaining from doing so for the present. Again, nothing…forbids such an ambition.”
Remember that when you see the shredded bodies of these useful toadies strewn across a bombed ground.
• These double-talking diplomats saved their dumbest observation for the end, about the toothless International Atomic Energy Agency, which is “negotiating” Iran to a peaceful conclusion. “Either we trust IAEA’s ability to supervise all its member states, including Iran, or we do not.”
Here is the closing scene:
Worthless IAEA negotiator: “Mr. President, are you building a nuclear bomb to destroy Israel and America and other enemies.”
Smiling Dwarf: “Of course not.”
Worthless IAEA negotiator, while stifling a yawn: “Okay. I didn’t think so. See you later.”
These scary people are in charge of our world.
The Wall Street Journal, which caters to normal people, espies the all-night flurry of sneak construction and concludes, wryly:
“Perhaps there’s an innocent explanation for all this (flurry of secretive activity in Iran), like Iran wanting to achieve technological independence in the manufacture of a new generation of refrigerators”
Kelvinator of Tehran is the Persian answer to Paul of Paul’s TV boasting in his television commercials, “I am the king.”
