Home Editor's Essays Name One Reason Why Illegal Immigrants Should Be Punished?

Name One Reason Why Illegal Immigrants Should Be Punished?

100
0
SHARE

[img]1|left|Ari Noonan||no_popup[/img]Most days of the year, the Los Angeles Times and The New York Times do not know whether Arizona is east of Eden or even still in the union.

Bulletin: Arizona just became the bullseye of the universe.

A bill that may become law by Saturday targets illegal immigrants. Lawmen would be required to stop and check the status of immigrants, who must pack proof of their legitimacy.

The politically absolutely correct boys and girls at the Times and The Times have been paralyzed by unrelenting hot flashes ever since hearing about this pregnant bill.

No insult, they have agreed, is too salty for the dastardly subhuman who fathered the bill, a Republican, naturally, one Russell Pearce.

Any hour, he will seize the mantle as the most reviled politician in America because he meets the two most important criteria:

No Mystery About His Eligibility

He is a Republican, and he admits he is.

The toy soldiers of political correctness have ruled that state Sen. Pearce has committed a vile act, designing a bill that would require immigrants to carry proof of their status. Since America has become overrun by illegals, his plan will seem eminently reasonable to some.

Which is precisely why the perennially soft-on-crime liberals oppose it.

As you may know, both Timeses tell their readers that the most recent ancestors of the bill’s author were richly covered in brown fur and walked on all fours.

Any afternoon now, I expect the L.A. Times’s favorite girl assassins, Annie Gorman and Round Robin Abcarian, to quit the closet on their hands and knees, pull their raggedy robes snugly about them, and hop a flight on the nearest broomstick to Phoenix.

Neither newspaper has been able to gain much traction with their apocalyptic climate change reports, and they were scouring around for a fresh turkey.

Halleluiah. There is a god.

Altering the Meaning of Words

Anti-illegal immigrant legislation for the bottom-feeders at the Times and The Times is like undreamed of other-worldly sustenance for a dying man.

The bill’s fate has not yet been determined — but will be in the next few hours — by the governor, who is the cover girl for the spring edition of “Who’s Who Among Nobodies.”

Our dear, imaginative, wrist-watching friends on the Left have spent the last 60 years corrupting our lexicon, just as Swish of the White House has swapped “war on terror” for “man-made disaster.”

It is a deadly, and terrifically successful, game. Words don’t mean what they used to mean.

The object of the corrupting: To make bad guys look good and good persons look evil by diverting and overturning the true meaning of words, a nasty rhetorical shell game.

Among lefties, they will be drummed out of the anvil chorus unless they refer to illegal immigrants, drop-dead lawbreakers, as “undocumented.”

“Illegal” sounds so icky, and accurate, too.

And then there is our aging hero, the lovely Cardinal Roger Mahoney, of whom it has been said here:

Were his morals as high as his girlish voice, the archdiocese of Los Angeles would have been in much better condition the last 25 years.

Morality is not his strength, and therefore Southern California has become paradise on earth for priests who like to play.

Roger Dodger, some critics have said, is lucky not to be in prison, given his swishing and swaying testimony of how little he knew about the priestly molesters who have poisoned the Catholic pulpit. Roger Dodger says he was playing Parcheesi at the time.

Since he never has been married, Roger Dodger obviously has no idea when to keep his mouth shut. Not the smartest person in the room — unless he is alone — Rog Who Dodges popped off last weekend about the Sen. Pearce legislation.

Given his dirty role in the interminable molestation scandals, Rog Who Dodges should be hiding under an anonymous desk with the retired Police Chief Ted Cooke.

But no.

In his latest display of classlessness, Roger Baby, ever the restrained one, drew parallels between Sen. Pearce’s proposal and the Nazis and Soviets, who were obligated to turn in party members.

Rog said on his website: “The Arizona legislature just passed the country’s most regressive, mean-spirited and useless anti-immigrant law,” characterizations with which he is intimately familiar.”

Shouldn’t Rog Who Dodges grab another dandy, former Gov. Blago of Illinois, by the hand and together they can run away from prosecution until the heat evaporates?