If you have been sunning on the moon the last few weeks, you could have forecast, to within a centimeter, exactly how the left would respond to Judge Stalker Walker’s balmy ruling that gay marriage not only is legal but darned near desirable.
Subtleties consistently elude the boys on the left. Two samples:
They favor the Ground Zero mosque because by golly whillickers thunder, the Constitution advocates freedom of religion — the first time the left has mentioned “religion” favorably since the spring of 1619. An invasion of sacred ground where 3,000 Americans were murdered by Muslim rads? Much too esoteric for the boys on the left.
With and without technicolor diapers — think about that — the perspiring boys on the left parade over the recent gay marriage court ruling, by an unbiased gay judge, because by thunder everybody knows gays are victims of those mean-spirited straight people. Harm to the institution of marriage when the thousands of years of human history is tossed aside like burnt toast is too nuanced of a consideration for them. If you can’t quantify it in the manner of 2 plus 2 or 3 plus 4, then it is beyond their ken.
Speaking of Screwballs
If you read the Los Angeles Times on Sunday morning, you practically could have envisioned The Nutty Professor, Erwin Chemerinsky, dancing across a stage at the Mayfair Burlesque Theatre in his new pink and orange tutu, with bright scarlet ribbons tied to each ear because his hair is too short.
The Professor was uncontrollably giddy as he not only celebrated the apparent destruction of Prop. 8 but the deconstruction of every silly American batty enough to vote for it or support it from afar.
Reasoning and reflecting are despised pastimes on the leftr.
Lordy, Lordy, how The Professor loves to dance on the graves of vanquished opponents, not just because his side prevailed in court but because they were evil and dastardly for challenging his wisdom.
The strangest sight of the weekend was observing this immodest and irretrievably immoderate dean of the U.C. Irvine Law School reveling in the prospect that opponents of gay marriage would have no legal standing to appeal Stalker Walker’s ruling.
Meaning that the argument is deader than class for the the Obama family.
Grinning greedily, the grisly Prof. Chemerinsky gloated over the fiery, deeply deserved mass deaths of opponents of gay marriage, at least in a legal sense.
Prof. C, who merits an F, made this argument on how the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals could validate his thesis:
“Article III of the U.S. Constitution restricts federal courts to decided ‘cases’ and ‘controversies.’ The Supreme Court long has held that in order to meet this requirement, a person or group pursuing legal action must have standing, a status conferred only on those who have suffered a direct, concrete injury. An ideological objection to a government action, no matter how strongly felt, is insufficient for standing.”
While The Nutty Professor still was polishing his veteran smirk this afternoon, the aforementioned 9th Circuit Court held up a Stop sign for the premature celebrants on the left.
They toppled Judge Stalker Walker’s ruling last week that same sex marriages in this state could resume in 48 hours. The upper court placed an indefinite hold on gay marriage while it considers whether the ban is Constitutional.
Meanwhile, a further appeal may be made next to Anthony Kennedy, the designated swinger voter on the U.S. Supreme Court who handles emergency motions.
If the supposedly desperate gay boys and gay girls on the left truly feel an urge to marry, I have a collection of ex-wives from where they might find candidates. Hmmm?
