Home Letters Why Back Newest Candidates Who Know Least About the District?

Why Back Newest Candidates Who Know Least About the District?

150
0
SHARE

By Alan Elmont

Re “Teachers Will Back Silbiger, Vizcarra and Taylor in Board Race”

Should we support union endorsements?

Is anyone surprised by the candidates the Culver City Federation of Teachers and the Assn. of Classified Employees are supporting?

True to form, the Culver City Unified School District unions once again back the newest candidates who know the least about the District finances and operations.

We already knew Karlo Silbiger would be a favorite. He and Nancy Goldberg cannot vote No on anything the Teachers Union supports.

The bulletin announcing the selection states: ”The union slate is a progressive, student-centered, pro-union, multi-ethnic group.”

Focus here on “pro-union” vs. pro-teacher.
We all know the purpose of the unions, rightfully, is to vigorously advocate for the wages, benefits and working conditions of its members.

We all know, our CCUSD staff (yes…everyone) are woefully under-compensated as compared to any neighboring or similar district. Worrisome, however, would be a School Board so beholden to its unions that the children no longer are the focus.

Isn’t there a conflict of interest inherent here?

The union, under the leadership of President David Mielke, has, for over a dozen years, wrapped itself in the cloak of “best for the students” as its mantra.

Yet it fails to fully support its newest teachers with its skewered annual raises (oops… don’t call it a raise. It is a negotiated step-and-column increase). It is unfortunate so many of our wonderful teachers do not step up and engage their own union. But the same can be said of our parents of whom merely 15 percent typically vote in School Board elections.

Over 90 percent of our School District budget goes to wages and benefits…

Does anyone wonder how that can be?

Does anyone wonder why our facilities are in disarray?

Does anyone believe supporting the union slate (watch as Karlo’s Democratic Club endorses the same slate) will be beneficial for our students and schools over these next four years?

Our School Board is dysfunctional now. Let’s not have it mirror the Sacramento Legislature (the only body that makes Congress look good).
Mr. Elmont may be contacted at
aelmont@ca.rr.com