Home OP-ED Future of Prop. 43 Water Bond – It Should Be Drowned

Future of Prop. 43 Water Bond – It Should Be Drowned

166
0
SHARE

[img]1862|right|John Walsh||no_popup[/img]Twenty million good reasons to vote No on Prop. 43, one for each gallon of clean water that went down the UCLA drain last week due to LADWP political disregard of water pipe maintenance and repair!

Dark Brown Water Bond stinking to high heaven! Flush it away!

The swing vote for Prop. 43 in November will be found among politically-correct Northern California Democrats, combined with Green Independents, who ordinarily never have met a bond measure they didn't like and knee-jerk vote for them, good or bad, at every opportunity.

Our website's goal now is to re-educate these crucial voters to realize that a No vote on Prop. 43 (http://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_43,_Water_Bond_%282014%29) is, in reality, a resounding Yes vote for clean water.

This Gov. Brown Water Bond measure –which currently has the Sacramento Legislature Dem leadership looking to tinker with its wording over the next few days with the goal of making it more voter-palatable by pulling the wool over our eyes — was designed to make Central California agribusiness, as well as Southern California mega real estate developers (particularly here in L.A.) even richer than they are right this instant.

Unlimited skyscraper construction requires unlimited water resources. The green that Democrat Party leaders genuinely care about can only be found in their billfolds!

As the Bay Area bumper sez :

Flush Twice, L.A. Needs the Water

Liberal pols are the real climate-change culprit-deniers. Every time a monstrous heat-radiating skyscraper is erected in California, a frighteningly large number of innocent, stranded polar bears find themselves sentenced to die a slow sad death amidst the melting glaciers of the rapidly-defrosting Arctic!

See jwalshconfidential.wordptress.com

[img]2695|exact|||no_popup[/img]