Home News Getting a Handal on Skid Row Crime

Getting a Handal on Skid Row Crime

354
0
SHARE
Los Angeles Skid Row. Photo: Wikimedia Commons
Jay Handal. Photo: (Anne Cusack /Los Angeles Times
Jay Handal. Photo: Anne Cusack /Los Angeles Times

[Editor’s Note: Mr. Handal, former Culver City business owner, is chair of the West Los Angeles Neighborhood Council, co-chair of the Los Angeles City Budget Advocates and a hearing examiner with the Los Angeles Police Commission.]

Here are the top four items the city of Los Angeles needs to seriously consider to effectively reduce crime and improve quality of life in Skid Row:

  1. Harsher penalties for individuals who sell scheduled narcotics within 500 feet of a drug or alcohol rehabilitation center (shelters, centers and hotels designed for rehabilitation). Narcotics sales are no longer considered a serious crime under the new realignment laws (AB109). Arrest without incarceration is sending a clear message to the criminals that there are no consequences for their actions. It also sends a resonating message to the community we serve that their government cannot protect them and/or does not value their recovery.

    The penalty for these suggested enhancements must be enforced.  We are seeking a mandatory minimum of six months in jail for said individuals (actual jail time).  Currently the criminals we arrest, are not in custody long enough to protect the recovery community from their activity. We are also requesting mandatory stay away orders for these offenders from the Skid Row recovery zones.  Selling narcotics near a recovery program must be amended to be a serious crime.  If we look at the rap sheets of many of the individuals we have repeatedly arrested over the years, it is clear that we, as a Department, have not failed the community.  It is our justice system that is failing them in its refusal to take a realistic look at the challenges the people of Skid Row confront. We must ensure that the courts more closely scrutinize the defendants in sales cases, as it relates to referring them to drug programs in the Skid Row area.  It simply gives them an excuse to remain in Skid Row and continue in their crimes under the guise of recovery.

  2.  We need a bolstered, more pro-active Bureau Streets Services.  The overwhelming concentration of bulk items in Skid Row is an absolute contributor to the health issues and diminished level of safety across the Skid Row community. The scarce response of Bureau Streets Services only helps to give the criminal element a stronger foothold. A focused, consistent response is necessary to improve the quality of life and reduce hiding places for the criminal element.
  3. Focus on decentralization of services to the homeless.  The current state of Skid Row being the mecca for all things homeless County-wide has failed the recovery community.  Skid Row, in its present state, is not conducive to recovery for the majority of those truly seeking to obtain and sustain sobriety. This is due to the overwhelming temptation to fail  because of the high concentration of criminality.  More homeless shelters and low-income supportive housing services in other areas of the city will remove some of the burden from Skid Row. The added housing will provide a safer, less congested location to recover in for those who remain as well as for those who would utilize the services away from Skid Row.
  4.  Restoration of the outreach component of the Safer Cities Initiative. We need assigned service providers within Central Station to be able to provide alternatives to jail for many of our arrestees. Their addictions or mental illness drive them to engage in certain non-serious crimes. This component should not be run by the Department, but as more of a partnership between the officers who arrest these individuals and the service providers to connect non-serious offenders with mental illness to services on the front end of the arrest process. As it relates to serious violent offenses, these advocates should be allowed to make recommendations to the District Attorney to seek long-term confinement and assistance to the serious violent offenders who suffer from mental illness. These would be attached to the police reports of the arresting officers for the District Attorney to review. The Public Defender’s office should be brought into the fold to ensure the entire criminal justice process is involved in the rehabilitation of violent mentally ill offenders. With these cases, we are not seeking for the District Attorney’s to make deals with the Public Defender for the purpose of a quick disposition of the cases.  We are seeking sentencing with involuntary care in mind for these cases.

 

Mr. Handal may be contacted at sgrest@aol.com