Home OP-ED ‘Muhammed and the Beanstalk’ at Ground Zero Would be an Irreversible...

‘Muhammed and the Beanstalk’ at Ground Zero Would be an Irreversible Disgrace

98
0
SHARE

The flaring national debate over the serio-comical notion of erecting a mosque at Ground Zero is as whacky as Mad Michelle, so flashy-trashy typical of the nouveau riche, traveling to Spain for a scant 75,000 of our tax dollars per day.

Sacred ground, boys.

Ever hear of that concept?

Why not bring a carnival and a few of Mad Michelle’s floozie friends to Arlington National Cemetery, break out the ferris wheels and merry-go-rounds over the graves, just for one day, to raise money for unemployed terrorists and their working families?

Pondering the wisdom of allowing a deceitful, virulently anti-American imam to plant a mosque on the grave of American victims of radical Islam is like seeking police permission to set your wife afire. Strictly for experimental purposes, you understand. Both ventures are equally meritorious, morally.

You Are Growing Very Sleepy

The fault lines trace directly to nouveau riche Swish Obama.

In less than two years, he has established a simplistic national tone, a bland, generic metric while subtly redistributing the wealth of American haves to the have-nots and never-wills.

We take you back to those dreadful days of yesteryear.

The lightest weight in modern Presidential history has dialed down the national dialogue to its rawest level since Indians were running amok, tomahawking scalps for the walls of their teepee master bedrooms.

Just as there was no rational explanation for 19 lunatic Muslims destroying Americans by the thousands on Sept. 11, equally there is no remote justification for permitting a dastardly imam, Feisal Abdul Rauf, to build a mosque two blocks from Ground Zero.

Rauf Rauf is a dandy, he is.

A sweetheart from the start, Rauf Rauf proudly has proclaimed that Americans were complicit in Sept. 11 — you know, Bush Lied, People Died. Rauf Rauf would make a fabulous Democrat.

He has suckered every American liberal in his path as he essays the Chutzpah Move of the Century.

Rauf Rauf could sell dog food to cats.

Rauf Rauf has outslicked Mike Bloomberg, the dingy (hard or soft “g”) runt ranter who runs New York City, and all the left wing political goons fawning around him.

Rauf Rauf Plays Rauf

Rauf Rauf makes fellow con artists look like Michelangelo — as in, long dead.

Here is a shocker, kind of. Rauf Rauf has snookered the Obama State Dept. — comparable to tricking a 6-day-old infant — into funding, with our tax dollars, a mission to the Middle East to raise $100 million for his project from fellow Muslim terrorists.

Since buying the Manhattan property a year ago July for $13.4 million with God- knows whose money, Rauf Rauf repeatedly has lied about funding sources for his proposed palace of malice.

The left, fronted by Swish, is like a 15-year-old girl who is winked at for the first time. When Muslim terrorists make eyes at the left, the left swoons, which is what has happened in this ludicrous scenario.

Swish’s most brilliant, most underappreciated achievement since a year ago last January has been slyly massaging masses of minds, especially the power elite — not to be confused with the citizenry — into believing a gully-whopper:

Radical Muslims, according to the Gospel of Swish, are the moral equals, are on a patriotic par with powder-puff Presbyterians and mutton-munching Methodists in their sporty, Friday-go-to-mosque muslim shirts.

Gullibly, our vulnerable collective psyche has seemed to swallow this remarkable manipulation by our colorblind race-centric President.

Or did we?

Like a desperately needed breath of air, CNN unveiled a poll yesterday afternoon declaring that almost 70 percent of Americans are opposed to the Ground Zero catastrophe, 82 percent of Republicans and 54 percent of Democrats.

Only the sheep-like left-wing journalists of America, led by The New York Times and mimicked by the baby-brother wannabe Los Angeles Times, say that our country should lend a helping hand to Muslim terrorists when they are in need.

Do you still wonder why Democrats get socked in the nose in most elections?

Traditionally wishy-washy on issues remotely involving morality, the Los Angeles Times and columnist Tiny Tim Rutten suddenly got Oh My Golly, Gee Whillikers religion yesterday.

Separately, in an editrial and an essay, they brazenly spanked the Anti-Defamation League in yesterday’s edition, which is like a child punishing his parents. The Times boys were offended at the Jewish group for having the incivil, anti-liberal hubris to object to Rauf Rauf planning a gigantic “Muhammad and the Beanstalk” shrine, atop the mangled bodies of 3,000 victims of radical Islam.

In last Sunday’s Times, another fairy tale was spun. Doyle (I Feel So Muhammed Today) McManus, writing from Washington, led off his essay with a juicy, face-splattering lie. Being astute, Times’ readers, naturally, never noticed.

Mr. McManus said that Rauf Rauf “has repeatedly denounced terrorism. He admonishes members of his congregation to be ‘both good Americans and good Muslims.’”

Mr. McManus either is stupid or a calculated liar.

Rauf Rauf, you should know, coldly, repeatedly, accused Americans of being behind Sept. 11. Rauf Rauf has a lengthy history of coddling Muslim terrorists.

The withering ignorance of this obviously unsophisticated stooge could cause heart palpitations in a ventriloquist and his dummy, reading from left to McManus.

I leave you to mull the stooge’s parting words:

“If American Muslims are allowed to build mosques only where Christians and Jews allow, we will be proving the Islamists’ point, that the West is every Muslim’s enemy.”