Home OP-ED In Defense of Illegals

In Defense of Illegals

93
0
SHARE

It is a rare morning when any of four mandatory staples is missing from the Los Angeles Titanic – bellowing defenses of illegal aliens, racial injustice and gays, plus two stories lampooning Republicans for losing twice to Swish Obama.

In the left’s obsessive search for political victims, the boys and girls downtown rubbed their shaky hands together last evening and stitched together this morning’s lead editorial, “Protect Arizona voting rights.”

As a card-carrying lefty, Nicky Goldberg, editor of the section, believes strongly that no human being should be labeled “illegal.”  Further, anyone clever enough to sneak across the border ands crawl among the grass blades, competing with insects and more dangerous animals, and survive, should be allowed to vote – and obtain a driver’s license, says the generous Mr. Goldberg. He should think so highly of Israel and his fellow Jews. (He does not.)

Citizenship papers are so yesterday, the Titanic repeatedly has argued.

The newspaper is outraged because Arizona, lousy with illegal aliens slowing the state’s economy – not to mention, daily flaunting of fundamental laws – has a stronger legal impediment to voting by non-citizens than the federal government.

Voter fraud has been rampant in the Democrat Party for decades. It was how Jack Kennedy became President in 1960. The unfunny comedian Al Franken became a U.S. senator from Minnesota four winters ago when necessarily “missing” ballots were found in a car trunk at a remote outpost. Oh.

Arizona demands proof of citizenship from questionable voters, not just the frequently broken word of illegals who have been spitting at the law since the first crawled through fences.

The creepy Mexican American “Legal” Defense Fund, marginally more legitimate than the Mafia, took Arizona to court, claiming that 31,000 Latin “citizens” were denied their voting rights.

“You betcha,” ruled the very left wing U.S.9th Circuit Court of Appeals, which annually has more decisions – by far – overturned than any other.

So the case went to the U.S. Supreme Court. A verdict is due near the end of the term in June.