A Veteran Talks Back to Homeland Security on Veterans’ Accusation

Robert L. RosebrockLetters

[Editor’s Note: Mr. Rosebrock, a frequent contributor, mainly on the subject of veterans’ rights, is one of the most forceful, outspoken defenders of the plight of veterans in Los Angeles.]

I want your readers to be aware of the American Legion’s strong response to the Dept. of Homeland Security’s unusual security report that went out last week to law enforcement agencies.

It warned about the “threatening” rise of “right-wing extremism” in view of expanding federal power, illegal immigration, the recession, abortion and pending restrictions on firearms. Amazingly, the report cited “disgruntled returning veterans” among those groups who represent a “danger” to our country.

Here is the letter from American Legion National Cmdr. David K. Rehbein:

Secretary Janet Napolitano
Department of Homeland Security
U.S. Department of Homeland Security Washington, DC 20528

April 13, 2009

Dear Secretary Napolitano,

On behalf of the 2.6 million-member American Legion, I am stating my concern about your April 7 report, “Right-wing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence and Recruitment.”

First, I want to assure you that the American Legion has long shared your concern about white supremacist and anti-government groups. In 1923, when the Ku Klux Klan still yielded unspeakable influence in this country, The American Legion passed Resolution 407. It resolved, in part, “…we consider any individual, group of individuals or organizations, which creates, or fosters racial, religious or class strife among our people, or which takes into their own hands the enforcement of law, determination of guilt, or infliction of punishment, to be un-American, a menace to our liberties, and destructive to our fundamental law…”

The best that I can say about your recent report is that it is incomplete. The report states, without any statistical evidence, “The possible passage of new restrictions on firearms and the return of military veterans facing significant challenges reintegrating into their communities could lead to the potential emergence of terrorist groups or lone wolf extremists capable of carrying out violent attacks.”

The American Legion is well aware and horrified at the pain inflicted during the Oklahoma City bombing, but Timothy McVeigh was only one of more than 42 million veterans who have worn this nation’s uniform during wartime. To continue to use McVeigh as an example of the stereotypical “disgruntled military veteran” is as unfair as using Osama bin Laden as the sole example of Islam.

Your report states that “Right-wing extremists were concerned during the 1990s with the perception that illegal immigrants were taking away American jobs through their willingness to work at significantly lower wages.” Secretary Napolitano, this is more than a perception to those who have lost their jobs. Would you categorize union members as “right-wing extremists”?

In spite of this incomplete, and, I fear, politically-biased report, the American Legion and the Department of Homeland Security share many common and crucial interests, such as the Citizen Corps and disaster preparedness. Since you are a graduate of New Mexico Girls State, I trust that you are very familiar with the American Legion. I would be happy to meet with you at a time of mutual convenience to discuss issues such as border security and the war on terrorism. I think it is important for all of us to remember that Americans are not the enemy. The terrorists are.

Sincerely,

David K. Rehbein
National Commander
The American Legion


Mr. Rosebrock may be contacted at rrosebrock@aol.com